Trading Pokemon Emulators Mac

Mena Writer Perez Reverte ordered to pay 80,000 euros for plagiarism

Hearing Madrid County sentenced the writer and academic of Language Arturo Perez-Reverte to pay 80,000 euros to the filmmaker Antonio Gonzalez-Vigil, who had sued for plagiarizing the script writer of the film "Gypsy" released in 2000. The creator of the famous saga of Captain Alatriste, meanwhile, told EFE that the legal decision is "an ambush" and "a clear move to blackmail." He added: "I have made a nice bed."


In 2003, Gonzalez-Vigil filed a lawsuit that eventually was shelved. But the filmmaker returned to the charge and now, eight years after the start of the judicial process at different levels, the failure of the Provincial High Court has established that the story line of the script of "Purple Hearts" Gonzalez-Vigil, "is has incorporated "into the play" Gypsy " Perez-Reverte, "without prejudice of that this has been fortified with other nuances." The compensation was reduced from 160,890 to 80,000 euros.


At sentencing, which is not yet final and against which Perez-Reverte and appealed to the Supreme Court, the Court determined that there was "a high degree of overlap between the two works" after reading the scripts and the analysis of comparative reports. Among the matches (see "Hearts ..."), the ruling argues that in both texts, a character utters the phrase of the Gospel "My kingdom is not of this world." Furthermore, the decision mentioned in the report of an expert on gambling which states that "from the quantitative point of view there are 77 matches, although some are more relevant than others."


Pérez-Reverte said the Court ignored "three final judgments" and "five expert reports." "The judgments stated that there was plagiarism. I do not understand how far the Court based its decision on a partial report of an expert witness in Argentina and expert testimony as a professional roulette juegador, "he told EFE the author of The Club Dumas.


He added: "Let me say that I need to copy a script from a guy who do not know and apparently nobody knows is so grotesque and ridiculous that would be laughing, if they had not gone so far as they have come. "


"Given that these coincidences define the argument, It was determined substantial similarities in the development of a plot and its denouement, the characters and minor characters and their relationships, leading to say that this can not be due to mere chance but the existence of plagiarism, though not literal or total, "says the statement.


Thus, the Court ruled that the similarities are derived from clichés of the genre and insists there is "significant evidence that transmission has been some conceptual, argumentative, structural, relational and atmosphere of a work on to another. " Insurgent



----------------------------------------- ------------------------------------